Earlham School of Religion

228 College Avenue, Richmond, IN 47374 • 1-800-432-1ESR

Academic Programs

Resources

Related Links

Faculty Evaluation of Access Course

Course Title:

Name:

Date:

PART I. Please evaluate this course experience from your perspective as an instructor by selecting the appropriate rating below for all that are applicable, with 1 being the lowest rating and 5 being the highest rating. Please provide narrative feedback for areas that receive a low rating.

1
2
3
4
5
    
 

Were you able to communicate course expectations with clarity?
 

Were you able to communicate your knowledge of subject area in an effective manner?
 

Were you satisfied with your course design in this format?
 

Were you satisfied with students' abilities to contribute to the class's learning in this context?
 

Were you able to accomplish your objectives for this course in this format?
 

Were the larger pedagogical concerns that accompany transformational learning met?
 

Were students able to participate in respectful dialogue, expressing and hearing differences with respect?
 

Were there good relationships with and between class members?
 

Were you able to provide timely and helpful feedback to student work?

Additional Comments:

PART 2. Please evaluate your satisfaction with these specific features or components of your course by selecting the appropriate rating below for ALL of the categories that are applicable, with 1 being the lowest rating and 5 being the highest rating. You may comment on any of these areas in the space that follows:

1
2
3
4
5
    
 

The use of technological tools was conducive to effective learning.
 

Format (online, intensive) was conducive to effective learning.
 

Communication and support from the ESR main campus was helpful.
 

The Moodle software was user-friendly and functioned efficiently.
 

Learning without the benefit of a traditional classroom was effective.
 

On-line discussions were constructive learning experiences.
 

Audio and video clips performed at an acceptable speed.
 

Library resources were not difficult for students to obtain.
 

Housing and meal arrangements (for intensives only) promoted community and learning.
 

Worship experiences (for intensives only) contributed to the learning and community process.

Additional Comments:

PART 3. The questions that follow provide an opportunity for you to reflect more specifically on the course. Please complete as fully as possible.

  1. At what specific point(s) did this course meet or fail to meet your expectations?

  1. What concrete changes will you make when you teach this course again? (What would you add, delete, substitute, modify, etc?)

  1. What institutional support do you need to help improve this course next time?

 

PART 4. Please evaluate the overall quality and value of this course as compared to other courses by selecting a number below. A 5 represents the highest possible rating, a 0 the lowest. You may add interpretive comments in the space that follows:

0 1 2 3 4 5

Additional Comments: